![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The FCC doesn't exactly like homebrew antennas IIRC, not specifically the amplification. I remember reading about how the FCC doesn't like the amplification of signals that people are doing at home.ġ30.20.74.174 23:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Amplification via antenna-only, to some extent, is still legal under FCC part 15 as long as certain limits are not reached. I know that I am an unregistered user, so fogive me, but should there be a section on the 'Legality of Cantennae' somewhere in the article? A cantenna can have up to 24 dB gain, while an omnidirectional unipole is what 3 or 4? Remove that nonsense. in what way is a Spider Omni "more potent"? -Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonstarbuck ( talk Īnd what does "more potent" mean with regard to antennas? Certainly not dB gain.Please? Prome theus -X303- 23:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC) more photos here Victor Grigas ( talk) 02:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Spider Omni S p l i n t a x (talk) 12:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC) "Even the Secret Service has taken an interest in the cantenna." Can we get a source for this?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |